- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What would be the worst war to fight in in history?
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:06 pm to red sox fan 13
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:06 pm to red sox fan 13
All of those sound more palatable than that medieval shite.
I mean I'd rather get shot than end up on a pike.
I mean I'd rather get shot than end up on a pike.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:18 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
All of those sound more palatable than that medieval shite.
I mean I'd rather get shot than end up on a pike.
I don't think most people can process what it would be like to fight in a jungle in Vietnam in the 1960's.
Thinking they could relate to a bunch of dirty, starving, toothless peasants hacking each other to pieces in the mud with swords and axes with no medical support or wagons to haul them off is just way beyond the reasoning of nearly anyone.
Any battlefield is terrible, but we value human life in a much more advanced way than civilization did in previous centuries and our methods of warfare reflect that. Life was much harder in every facet back then and its easy to forget how far we've come.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 9:12 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
All of those sound more palatable than that medieval shite.
I mean I'd rather get shot than end up on a pike.
I’ll counter with this, the reason why I would rather be on the medieval battlefield and earlier is that, comparatively speaking, the medieval battle did not last as long. You could be in relative safety one day, be in mortal danger the next, and be in relative safety again the day after that.
Whereas, let’s just pick any number of famous 20th Century battles; Verdun for example. Verdun lasted almost 10 months. That’s 10 months of being under constant threat of death and artillery fire. Whole units would take multiple turns at the battle, that’s how long it lasted. You could ostensibly have served at Verdun for a couple weeks, then gone to another battlefield for a couple weeks, have a couple weeks R&R, and then go back to Verdun and be in the worst battlefield in human history.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:46 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
I mean I'd rather get shot than end up on a pike.
I bet a lot of guys at Verdun would have rather be run in with a spear than bear days on end of shelling.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)