Started By
Message

re: Victims of Toronto mass shooting using S&W

Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96710 posts
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:05 pm to
I’m sure the push on here is one or both of the following-

1. Make “smart” firearms mandatory as to raise the price of weapons to make them unaffordable

2. “Smart” firearms will either be wholly unreliable, preventing someone from lawfully defending themselves, or will be required to have some form of override that inactivates them in the presence of a signal


The overall effect of either would be to disarm civilians en masse.
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5346 posts
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

1. Make “smart” firearms mandatory as to raise the price of weapons to make them unaffordable

2. “Smart” firearms will either be wholly unreliable, preventing someone from lawfully defending themselves, or will be required to have some form of override that inactivates them in the presence of a signal


I would say all that is half of it. What I mean is lawyers profit by being able to sue everything and gun control advocates get to infringe further on gun owners. Much like we see leftists using kids to promote transgenderism, I see the same with lawyers and gun control advocates .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram