re: Yet another CFP Committee complaint thread. !!WiTh NuMbERrrS!!

quote:

---

You can't get that 10.6 figure without including Texas if you included them in the first number. What is Texas currently ranked? 35ish? This means the second number would be more like 16.75ish

This type of shite is what flat-earthers and Holocaust deniers do.

---

Hey a-hole.

I did the same for Ohio State.

quote:

---

Ohio State marquee opponents rankings
Format: ranking@gametime, currentranking teamname (record, loss)

#UR, #20 Cincinnati (10-2, Memphis)
#13, #8 Wisconsin (10-2, Illinois)
#8, #10 Penn State (10-2, Minnesota)
#13, #14 Michigan (9-3, Wisconsin, Penn State)

TOTALS - #11.3, #13

---

You think Im going to undermine my own credibility? Who do you think I am? A CFP Committee member?

quote:

---

Teams' recruiting class rankings don't matter - see FSU, USC, Texas, A&M.

---

Yeah, no shite.

It doesnt factor in coaching and a shite ton of other variables.

The point was, even if in vain, to find some other subjective criteria for determining the relative strengths of these opponents.

I did the best I could without spending the countless time and energy needed to formulate the highly complex algorithm necessary to accurately parse out the college football world and its incredible imparity.

You think you can do better. Please do.

Honestly. Im not being facetious. All most want is the truth. As close as we can come. Youre not going to get that with 13 humans watching games on a laptop and dropping beans in a jar.

We can do better. We HAD better. Its clear now that they dont want to do better.