re: NYT : Barr's belief that FBI probe was not legitimate is based directly on Durham findings

IMO this sounds like Horowitz investigation was limited (internal FISA procedures) in scope, and based on his limited scope findings, he can't come to definitive conclusions. However, Durham's investigation was grater (international interactions related to FISA and more) and he has more of the details.

NYT (and other MSM outlets) are already trying to put the focus narrative on "Horowitz, who is independent, found nothing illegial, and Durham/Barr are just doing Trumps bidding"