- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stunning Admission By Renowned Atheist; Decline of Christianity is Hurting Society
Posted on 11/9/19 at 3:28 pm to Bard
Posted on 11/9/19 at 3:28 pm to Bard
quote:We receive morality either subjectively from within ourselves, subjectively from without ourselves but from other people, or from an objective source.
Which is a subjective definition because experiencing morality can impact how one receives morality, even objective morality.
quote:God's moral law.
Give me an example of a moral absolute, something that comes from outside humanity.
quote:Interpretation is certainly subjective because it, too, comes from within human beings. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about how we interpret our moral standards, but where the moral standards come from.
I disagree. The hallmark of subjectivity is interpretation and that interpretation is built by experiences. The interpretation is what creates the subjectivity.
A moral standard that comes from my own mind is subjective. A moral standard that is imposed on me from outside my mind or other human minds is objective. This is why I was talking about origins or morality, not simply our experience of it.
I also think you might be wandering into the pool of subjective reality, where there are no absolute truths. That's, at least, how I'm interpreting what you're saying. It seems like you're saying our experience dictates reality rather than reality existing outside of our experiences.
quote:I'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense. Objectivity and subjectivity are conflicting concepts. Objectivity doesn't exist on the far end of the subjective spectrum because we're not talking about a spectrum. Objectivity and subjectivity are black and white concepts.
And that's where the sticking point comes in. You're trying to make an objective observation over something that is inherently subjective. Objective morals can be reached subjectively because objectivity is the extreme end of the subjectivity spectrum.
An objective moral standard is one by definition if it comes from without and is not based on our own feelings, desires, or experiences. If each individual can have a different view of it, it's not objective.
quote:I don't know what you're trying to say here. I'm saying objectivity and subjectivity are black and white concepts, not shades of grey.
It's like saying you have a scale of greys but not allowing black or white (which are the necessary ingredients to make grey).
Posted on 11/9/19 at 4:06 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I also think you might be wandering into the pool of subjective reality, where there are no absolute truths. That's, at least, how I'm interpreting what you're saying. It seems like you're saying our experience dictates reality rather than reality existing outside of our experiences.
One of the dangers of this thinking, is that proponents no longer believe in truth, and they turn on society and attempt to dismantle it.
Criticism is healthy, but deconstructionist are unable to do anything else, because they do not believe in truth, they can not build anything.
This post was edited on 11/9/19 at 4:21 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News