re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

quote:

---

this jury determined that this father should not have the right to make any decision of legal significance whatsoever with regard to his children.

---

First of all, we need to know if this decision is because he wouldn’t agree to chemical castration and sexual abuse of his son.

quote:

---

Change the medical issue for one with less emotional resonance, in order to objectively understand the issues that were presented to the court. Imagine that 10 doctors had opined that this child needed heart surgery, yet the father refused to accept that diagnosis, refused to acquiesce in heart surgery, and continued to insist that the child engage in sporting activities involving cardiovascular stress while in the father’s possession.

---

This isn’t a medical decision. It’s purely ideological. Which of course you know.