- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

"First-hand Knowledge" vs "Public Transcript of Call": what's the difference?
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:18 am
Would someone please explain this to me? Don't we all now have first-hand knowledge of the call via the transcript?? T.I.A.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 9:19 am
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:21 am to tigerpawl
I sit and listen to a deposition and tell you what happened may not be 100% in line with the transcript.
Plus, my perspective (bias) is going to influence what I think was significant.
In other words, my first hand knowledge will not prevail in court versus the transcript.
Plus, my perspective (bias) is going to influence what I think was significant.
In other words, my first hand knowledge will not prevail in court versus the transcript.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:21 am to tigerpawl
Transcripts don't have magical mind reading powers. They just have words and facts.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 9:44 am
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:39 am to auggie
quote:Kryptonite to Democrats.
It just has words and facts.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:49 am to tigerpawl
First hand knowledge [of Trump’s thoughts and intent].
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:51 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Ahhh, Trump must be the 2nd whistleblower then.
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:54 am to tigerpawl
The transcript itself is hearsay.
But it probably meets one of more exceptions to the rule.
But it probably meets one of more exceptions to the rule.
Popular
Back to top
4








