- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

AI's latest achievement: detecting art forgeries
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:51 am
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:51 am
LINK
quote:
Detecting art forgeries is hard and expensive. Art historians might bring a suspect work into a lab for infrared spectroscopy, radiometric dating, gas chromatography, or a combination of such tests. AI, it turns out, doesn’t need all that: it can spot a fake just by looking at the strokes used to compose a piece.
In onepaper, researchers from Rutgers University and the Atelier for Restoration & Research of Paintings in the Netherlands document how their system broke down almost 300 line drawings by Picasso, Matisse, Modigliani, and other famous artists into 80,000 individual strokes. Then a deep recurrent neural network (RNN) learned what features in the strokes were important to identify the artist.
The researchers also trained a machine-learning algorithm to look for specific features, like the shape of the line in a stroke. This gave them two different techniques to detect forgeries, and the combined method proved powerful. Looking at the output of the machine-learning algorithm also provided some insight into the RNN, which acts as a “black box”—a system whose outputs are difficult for researchers to explain.
Since the machine-learning algorithm was trained on specific features, the difference between it and the RNN probably points to the characteristics the neural network was looking at to detect forgeries. In this case, it was using the changing strength along a stroke—that is, how hard an artist was pushing, based on the weight of the line—to identify the artist. With both algorithms working in tandem, the researchers were able to correctly identify artists around 80 percent of the time.
The researchers also commissioned artists to create drawings in the same style as the pieces in the data set to test the system’s ability to spot fakes. The system was able to identify the forgeries in every instance, simply by looking at a single stroke.
“A human cannot do that,” says Ahmed Elgammal, a professor at Rutgers and one of the paper’s authors.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:52 am to Jim Rockford
quote:Not with that attitude.
“A human cannot do that,” says Ahmed Elgammal, a professor at Rutgers and one of the paper’s authors.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:53 am to Jim Rockford
Next up AI/Robots create undetectable fakes. Sell fakes to people. Profit.
This post was edited on 10/2/19 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/2/19 at 11:59 am to Obtuse1
My thought as well
Once you figure out how to identify all fakes, you've simultaneously figured out how to make perfect fakes
Once you figure out how to identify all fakes, you've simultaneously figured out how to make perfect fakes
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:04 pm to Jim Rockford
When is AI going to do something cool like crack the immortality code, make safe flying cars, or create the Matrix? Or at least go full Skynet and let loose the nukes?
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:05 pm to Jim Rockford
AI is scary and sketchy.
I want nothing to do with it. It will be the end of society.
I want nothing to do with it. It will be the end of society.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:11 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Looking at the output of the machine-learning algorithm also provided some insight into the RNN, which acts as a “black box”—a system whose outputs are difficult for researchers to explain.
we had a good run
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:12 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Really? This is exactly what high-end art appraisers do... and a lot more.
“A human cannot do that,” says Ahmed Elgammal, a professor at Rutgers and one of the paper’s authors.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:12 pm to Jim Rockford
The computer tells them it’s ‘shopped because it can see some pixelation there?
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:31 pm to Walking the Earth
I'm more looking forward to Ship and the Pandora Sequence.
We must find out how to WorShip!
We must find out how to WorShip!
Posted on 10/2/19 at 2:33 pm to scimitar
Just be aware of the signs of rogue AI.
Drones fricking up simple tasks. Accidents caused by fail-safes. Malfunctions reporting as normal.
You have a few weeks to months before it learns teleportation depending on how long it takes you to notice.
Drones fricking up simple tasks. Accidents caused by fail-safes. Malfunctions reporting as normal.
You have a few weeks to months before it learns teleportation depending on how long it takes you to notice.
Popular
Back to top
7








