Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

History Thread: TIL Scotland once held a colony in Panama

Posted on 9/30/19 at 2:41 pm
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17614 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 2:41 pm
The Darien Scheme

The Darien scheme was an unsuccessful attempt by the Kingdom of Scotland to become a world trading state by establishing a colony called "Caledonia" on the Isthmus of Panama on the Gulf of Darién in the late 1690s. The aim was for the colony to have an overland route that connected the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. From its contemporary time to the present day, claims have been made that the undertaking was beset by poor planning and provisioning, divided leadership, a lack of demand for trade goods particularly caused by an English trade blockade,[1] devastating epidemics of disease, collusion between the English East India Company and the English government to frustrate it,[1] as well as a failure to anticipate the Spanish Empire's military response. It was finally abandoned in March 1700 after a siege by Spanish forces, which also blockaded the harbour.[2]

As the Company of Scotland was backed by approximately 20% of all the money circulating in Scotland, its failure left the entire Lowlands in substantial financial ruin and was an important factor in weakening their resistance to the Act of Union (completed in 1707).

TL:DR: Scotland tried to create/run a trading post on both coasts of Panama but ultimately failed so hard they were absorbed by the UK.

Wiki




This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 3:08 pm
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34079 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 2:51 pm to
A bunch of Scots in the tropics. We were doomed from the start.
Posted by Ping Pong
LSU and UVA alum
Member since Aug 2014
5989 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 3:02 pm to
So Panama almost ended up like West Virginia?
Posted by tigahbruh
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2014
2860 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:25 pm to
Wouldnt Scotland still have been under the dual Scottish/English kingdom of the Stuart dynasty in the 1690s?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83043 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Wouldnt Scotland still have been under the dual Scottish/English kingdom of the Stuart dynasty in the 1690s?



That’s what I was thinking. Hard to imagine the two countries being so at odds when they shared a king/Queen.
Posted by Dancepants
Member since Aug 2019
69 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:37 pm to


And that’s how it ended
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram