re: Is it possible the Whistleblower DID have first hand knowledge

I really don't know you - but if you are repulsed by that analogy or think it is is inappropriate to the discussion, then I can - in the spirit of DEMOCRAT policies - FULLT SUBSTANTIATE that allegation.

I TOO have heard people who claimed to have true information on the matter say that your wife/so DID diddle random postal workers.

And this carries JUST AS MUCH WEIGHT as the so-called "whistle-blower" until the people who actually ARE 'close to the matter" come forward and DECLARE that they did indeed inform the 'whistle-blower' of those facts - and that they INDEED do actually support the WB's description fo the events he "heard from them about" are actually TRUE and ACCURATE according to what you "told" hime - and that they will SWEAR under penalty of PERJURY that they agree with his statement.

Until THAT happens, our allegations against your wife are just a "credible' as this asshhat who remains unnamed.

F.U. for not acknowledging an entirely APPROPRIATE analogy - which is FAR more ON-POINT than the 'parody" which lying scum sucker Adam Shiff put out for the NEWS MEDIA to hang their hats on for a week now - comparing Trumps to the MAFIA


BOOM! Low IQ idiot.