re: Is it possible the Whistleblower DID have first hand knowledge

quote:

---

Thanks for taking a political conversation to a fifth grade level. If you don't have intellectual insight to add to the conversation, just walk away bro.

---

I really don't know you - but if you are repulsed by that analogy or think it is is inappropriate to the discussion, then I can - in the spirit of DEMOCRAT policies - FULLT SUBSTANTIATE that allegation.

I TOO have heard people who claimed to have true information on the matter say that your wife/so DID diddle random postal workers.

And this carries JUST AS MUCH WEIGHT as the so-called "whistle-blower" until the people who actually ARE 'close to the matter" come forward and DECLARE that they did indeed inform the 'whistle-blower' of those facts - and that they INDEED do actually support the WB's description fo the events he "heard from them about" are actually TRUE and ACCURATE according to what you "told" hime - and that they will SWEAR under penalty of PERJURY that they agree with his statement.

Until THAT happens, our allegations against your wife are just a "credible' as this asshhat who remains unnamed.

F.U. for not acknowledging an entirely APPROPRIATE analogy - which is FAR more ON-POINT than the 'parody" which lying scum sucker Adam Shiff put out for the NEWS MEDIA to hang their hats on for a week now - comparing Trumps to the MAFIA.

EDIT - AHA - I have just been vindicated There is a post on this very thread - a public forum - just like the NYT and CNN and MSNBC and NPR and ABC and CBS (who all added 'credibility' to the WB story and carried the water of the "mafia" comparison) just a few lines up from THIS post that makes the EXACT SAME allegation that I just did -

CONFIRMATION CONFIRMED - MUST be true.