re: So what’s the deal with a WWL employee calling Seth Dunlap a bad name?

quote:

---

Seth denies he tweeted this. Where is the proof? Looks to me like they are trying to discredit Seth to get out of paying him the $1.8m. Seth passed a lie detector in which he said he didn't do it and that he never had the twitter password. WWL does not even have him on the list of people who had the password.

In fact, Entercom offered him a settlement which he turned down. Then, they started trying to tear him down and create a false narrative. WWL has NEVER asked any of the people with Twitter access if they did it. That was not an option. From day 1 this has been about Entercom finding a way to mitigate the lawsuit, even it they were at fault.

---

How would you know what and who they asked and what, if any, offer was made? They supposedly have forensic evidence that ties the tweet to his phone and video evidence showing the phone in his possession when the tweet was made. A lie detector test that he arranged and controlled is irrelevant.