- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should the National League adopt the designated hitter?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 2:08 pm to Fairbanks
Posted on 8/15/19 at 2:08 pm to Fairbanks
There are more substitutions and especially more double switches in the NL. It’s common knowledge that being a manager requires more in-game strategy in the NL.
I think that the DH in 1973 was more of a gimmick to spark attention/conversation, because the numbers have never confirmed that the game has improved noticeably because of it. The average team gets about 10 extra hits per season because of the DH rule.
I think that the DH in 1973 was more of a gimmick to spark attention/conversation, because the numbers have never confirmed that the game has improved noticeably because of it. The average team gets about 10 extra hits per season because of the DH rule.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 4:33 pm to xiv
quote:pretty sure that's wrong
The average team gets about 10 extra hits per season because of the DH rule.
Replace a .150 hitting pitcher with a .230 DH and it's like 25 hits in a season assuming two at bats a game are replaced
But games are long enough already. Do we really need more offense?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)