Started By
Message

re: Judge transgender bathroom restrictions unconstitutional

Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111803 posts
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

You would pounce on a Republican for doing the same thing.


Of course he would. The emperor has no clothes and everyone sees it. Hank still pretends he’s wearing a robe.

Reading the opinion reads like a bit from Animal Farm. “Gender is a deeply held internal sense of being a man or woman.” There’s no legal analysis. It’s just “Here’s what your overlords are telling you. Now suck it.”
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22273 posts
Posted on 8/13/19 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Of course he would. The emperor has no clothes and everyone sees it. Hank still pretends he’s wearing a robe.


I don't know about Hank (I haven't posted here that long) but that absolutely describes a large chunk of the judiciary these days. This decision came down to "legal analysis" about as much as Obergefell.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram