- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: SCOTUS approves use of Pentagon funds for Border Wall
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:47 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:47 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
that litigation will continue vis-à-vis litigants with more substantive standing claims.
Who would these litigants actually be? The only ones I can reasonably foresee are those filing Takings Clause claims under 5A.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:50 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:The property owners that you describe would not have standing to challenge the spending under the NEA. They would only have standing to challenge the taking of their own property and the price paid under eminent domain.
Who would these litigants actually be? The only ones I can reasonably foresee are those filing Takings Clause claims under 5A.
The extant litigants in question, as I recall, are several state governments, plus (I think) the house of representatives.
As I recall, all of those lawsuits were stayed, pending the appellate process in the Sierra Club case. those stays, in my opinion were foolishness, because anyone with half a brain would have recognized the standing issues which became problematic in the Sierra Club case.
This post was edited on 7/26/19 at 9:00 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News