Too broad of a statement.

I own a corporation, and I can tell you I'm not a driving force behind globalism with my 25 employees designing and managing employee group benefits packages, 401k's, and family retirement planning portfolios.

You're talking about billion dollar multi-national conglomerate monopolies that are part of the Donor Class, who participate in the Military Industrial Complex, and have entire law firms on payroll drawing up physical legislation that makes it's way to corrupted and owned Legislators who pass it for their and their cronies benefit.

98% of "Corporations" and the "Free-Market Capitalist Society" in this country don't fit that profile.

So be careful with your language when trying to educate people. Sometimes the details matter.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by volod

Leesville, LA

Member since Jun 2014

5392 posts

Posted on 7/22/19 at 4:16 pm to BeefDawg

quote:
You're talking about billion dollar multi-national conglomerate monopolies that are part of the Donor Class, who participate in the Military Industrial Complex, and have entire law firms on payroll drawing up physical legislation that makes it's way to corrupted and owned Legislators who pass it for their and their cronies benefit.

98% of "Corporations" and the "Free-Market Capitalist Society" in this country don't fit that profile.

Understood. But in fairness, marketing typically portrays corporations as you describe. People dont think of your local law or construction company as a Corporation although by definition they are.

So how to distinguish between a company like Exxon vs. your organization. Would Conglomerate be a more accurate term.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by PEPE

Member since Jun 2018

8198 posts

Posted on 7/22/19 at 4:24 pm to BeefDawg

Correct I'm referring specifically to corporations with a global reach already, or aspirations of a global reach in the future.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1