- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Illegal Aliens count towards congressional representation?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:16 am to SlapahoeTribe
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:16 am to SlapahoeTribe
quote:You referenced my statement that was referring to the original text about the Census and congressional representation, which refers to both slaves and free-persons and delineates between the 2.
BUT DOES IT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT SLAVES?
Furthermore, since the 14th Amendment resulted from the end of slavery and addressed issues of it, then slavery is relevant to it.
quote:Well the text in the Constitution regarding the census and its impact on approbations does refer to slavery but the 14th Amendment made it useless.
ETA- So, I’m agreeing with you on that; let’s only look at the actual text.
The fact is nothing in the original Constitution has changed: all free persons (i.e., now everybody) is to be counted and appropriations are based on the data. If, and only if, states denied eligible voters the right to vote, then the Constitution allows for their proportion of the population can be reduced accordingly, although it has never been successfully enforced.
Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution:
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:36 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
appropriations are based on the data. If, and only if, states denied eligible voters the right to vote, then the Constitution allows for their proportion of the population can be reduced accordingly
Where does it state this?
It only says “denied.” Not “improperly denied.” Not “denied by the State.”
Are illegals allowed to vote? No. They are denied (deprived of) that right.
In fact (perhaps more importantly), look just past the qualifications of the denial (being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States,) to what follows them: “or in any way abridged.” Care to guess what the old meaning of abridged was? Deprived.
So, we have, as the text is written, that it isn’t an action taken by a state, and it applies to anyone that in “any way” isn’t allowed to vote. Then it directs the representation to be reduced to an amount that would be proportional to having only counted the number of eligible voters.
*Edit for predictive text errors.
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 2:40 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)