Started By
Message

re: Lonzo v Moore

Posted on 7/8/19 at 11:19 am to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61645 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

we’ll hurt his trade value if we do that


I really think he gets traded this summer. If they were just working on a "soluition" for Wood it seems like a simple trade or cut would have happened by now. Wood makes sense as part of a package with Moore.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:07 pm to
If moore is playing the way he has been the past few years, plus the expiring contract he could easily be kept, played the same no of minutes as he has been, and then traded at the deadline.

Alot depends on what happens. Lets say Hart and Zo are shooting better and NAW is developing quickly, then Moore becomes expendable.

Lets say we’re not in playoff contention, then Moore becomes expendable. No reason not to let zo, Hart, and Naw develop.

But if we are contending and zo, hart, and naw are progressing slowly shooting wise, Moore will definitely be kept, whether we let his contract expire or resign him.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram