- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lonzo v Moore
Posted on 7/8/19 at 11:19 am to P bean
Posted on 7/8/19 at 11:19 am to P bean
quote:
we’ll hurt his trade value if we do that
I really think he gets traded this summer. If they were just working on a "soluition" for Wood it seems like a simple trade or cut would have happened by now. Wood makes sense as part of a package with Moore.
Posted on 7/8/19 at 12:07 pm to TigerinATL
If moore is playing the way he has been the past few years, plus the expiring contract he could easily be kept, played the same no of minutes as he has been, and then traded at the deadline.
Alot depends on what happens. Lets say Hart and Zo are shooting better and NAW is developing quickly, then Moore becomes expendable.
Lets say we’re not in playoff contention, then Moore becomes expendable. No reason not to let zo, Hart, and Naw develop.
But if we are contending and zo, hart, and naw are progressing slowly shooting wise, Moore will definitely be kept, whether we let his contract expire or resign him.
Alot depends on what happens. Lets say Hart and Zo are shooting better and NAW is developing quickly, then Moore becomes expendable.
Lets say we’re not in playoff contention, then Moore becomes expendable. No reason not to let zo, Hart, and Naw develop.
But if we are contending and zo, hart, and naw are progressing slowly shooting wise, Moore will definitely be kept, whether we let his contract expire or resign him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News