- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Multiple NBA Teams Phasing Out Term 'Owner'
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:50 am to PeteRose
Posted on 6/5/19 at 8:50 am to PeteRose
quote:
Yup. So what next? The word “Trade” is to be determined racist because of “slave trade”
Nope, no more trading players. It's insensitive. "Asset transfers" is the new nomenclature. Not directly affecting you. Not hurting anything. But you're exposing yourself as a not woke person if you keep calling them trades.
Also, please stop saying "lockdown" defender, as slaves were locked in chains. And refrain from saying trad-- I mean, asset transfer "deadline." Do you know how many blacks died during slavery? Should blacks today really have to deal with that kind of verbiage?
Also, the concept of "divisions" is inherently anti-diversity, and we'll not have it in a league dominated by PoC. Our teams are unified in their conferences as they compete for the honor of representing their fellow clubs in the Finals.
It's not directly affecting you, and it's not hurting anything, but you really should refrain from your bigoted, outdated terminology. What if a minority hears you?
Posted on 6/5/19 at 11:22 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Nope, no more trading players. It's insensitive. "Asset transfers" is the new nomenclature
Did you...did you just assert that players were...assets? Like property?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News