Started By
Message

re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense

Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:39 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Using "dog years" when converting human->dog AND dog->human doesn't make any sense!
There isn’t a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a human to a dog.

There’s only a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a dog to a human.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28746 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

There isn’t a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a human to a dog.

Sure there is. It's "dog years".
quote:

There’s only a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a dog to a human.
You think that there is only a term for that because you've been using "dog years" incorrectly your whole life. If instead you would say a dog is so many "human years" old, you might see that it works for any two animals. Assuming, of course, that you define the term correctly.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram