- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:39 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:39 pm to Korkstand
quote:There isn’t a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a human to a dog.
Using "dog years" when converting human->dog AND dog->human doesn't make any sense!
There’s only a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a dog to a human.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:49 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
There isn’t a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a human to a dog.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Sure there is. It's "dog years".
quote:You think that there is only a term for that because you've been using "dog years" incorrectly your whole life. If instead you would say a dog is so many "human years" old, you might see that it works for any two animals. Assuming, of course, that you define the term correctly.
There’s only a term for the concept of converting the aging process of a dog to a human.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)