- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:30 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:30 pm to Korkstand
quote:Because dog years has a definition and you aren’t using correctly
So when a dog is 7 years old, how can anyone argue that he's not also 7 "dog years" old?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:40 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Because dog years has a definition and you aren’t using correctly
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Right back at ya.
Yeah, "dog years" has a definition, and it means an animal's age expressed as an equivalent age of a dog. When applied to a human, it's about 7 to 1 (7 year old human is 1 dog year old). When applied to a dog, it's 1 to 1 (1 year old dog is 1 dog year old).
Likewise, "human years" has a definition, and it means an animal's age expressed as an equivalent age of a human. When applied to a dog, it's about 1 to 7 (1 year old dog is 7 human years old). When applied to a human, it's 1 to 1 (1 year old human is 1 human year old).
This is really simple shite if you just think about what you're saying.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)