- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did it become conservative to support a large standing army?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 1:18 pm to TideCPA
Posted on 5/20/19 at 1:18 pm to TideCPA
quote:
Since we've had a massive standing army, our major engagements have been in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq x2, and Afghanistan. Mixed results at best, especially in the nuclear era where large standing armies are useless except as an occupational force.
Thats actually a good point. The two wars most Americans bank on when discussing the military were won with relatively small standing armies at the start of each war.
Why do we need huge armies when they arguably slow us down and create poor performance?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News