Started By
Message

re: Renovating the Superdome vs building a new bridge in Baton Rouge

Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:35 am to
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
3912 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:35 am to
I realize all of that Chief. You add all of those up over the next 10 years. You compare that to the that will use the new bridge for commerce and travel (even to New Orleans or the Superdome). More people will use the bridge in one year than 10 years of use in the Superdome. Also, those events will still be held in the Superdome regardless.

And if you’re worried about the Saints moving, they won’t. Even if they did, the NFL would want a team in New Orleans market immediately. There’s no reason for this when you need a bridge.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:

And if you’re worried about the Saints moving, they won’t.


I’m not and I never said that

quote:

Also, those events will still be held in the Superdome regardless.


Who’s going to maintain a new bridge, a new stadium and the Superdome?
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

More people will use the bridge in one year


sounds like a toll you'd be happy to pay for daily
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 10:43 am to
Building a new bridge in Baton Rouge will do nothing but help the people move out quicker.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47822 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Even if they did, the NFL would want a team in New Orleans market immediately.
no they wouldn't. We're too small.

We better keep the teams we got bc we're not getting new ones
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram