re: James Woods with the boom

quote:

---

Look though. ANOTHER Hank post trying to steer a thread.

---

Shorty, cover up. Your obsession is showing.

OP posted a Woods tweet, implying that it was particularly noteworthy. By doing so, he implicitly elicited comment on that tweet.

I commented that those who ALEADY agree with Woods would see it as a “boom,” and that those who ALREADY disagree would see it as a silly non-sequitur.

I fail to see how that comment constitutes some nefarious effort to “steer” the thread ... unless one simply opposes competing views as a matter of principle.