- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is "slut shaming" suddenly frowned upon?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:54 pm to TheCaterpillar
Posted on 5/2/19 at 1:54 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Honestly, it is a huge double standard. No one cares if a dude fricks 100+ women, but if a chick sleeps with 100+ men, she basically has to move out of town
This.
The crusade against "slut shaming" is about the paradigm in which a man who sleeps around is lauded and a woman who sleeps around is shamed.
Now, the evolutionary reason behind this is deep seated: if a man sleeps with a hundred women and they only sleep with him, anyone who gets pregnant is pregnant with his child. A woman who sleeps with a hundred men and they only sleep with her, if she gets pregnant, we (historically) have no idea who the father is. That creates a burden on society and a rift in the tribe that we don't want.
But with the rise of paternity testing, the underlying purpose behind the shaming no longer exists. But, there's still going to be a lag between then and when public sentiment catches up.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:07 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
But with the rise of paternity testing, the underlying purpose behind the shaming no longer exists. But, there's still going to be a lag between then and when public sentiment catches up.
I'd say the advent of birth control and abortion might have more to do with making the "shaming no longer exist" than does paternity testing.
Paternity testing of a birthed child can prevent a certain male from being a cuckold, but it still does not relieve the female or her community (family for the most part) from the "burdens" of that child. A male can spread his seed far without having that burden if he doesn't want it or isn't forced into doing it, in theory. The cost of producing an egg is expensive, with a limited resource per female, with a "best used by date," where as a man could father children well into his dotage as long as he can get it up.
Birth control/abortion has "leveled" the sexual playing field for women, allowing them the option to go from bed to bed like men can do.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 12:44 pm to Joshjrn
This is a very common misconception. Occam's razor actually doesn't apply to this situation. There is a lot more going on behind the scenes with both men and women than just "I wanna spread my seed" or "My bastard child is a burden."
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News