Started By
Message

re: 1st quarter GDP: 3.2%

Posted on 4/26/19 at 8:46 am to
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12845 posts
Posted on 4/26/19 at 8:46 am to
ITC Report

quote:

The Commission used a combination of detailed quantitative and qualitative industry analyses and an economy-wide computable general equilibrium model to assess the likely impact of USMCA on the U.S. economy and industry sectors. The model estimates that, if fully implemented and enforced, USMCA would have a positive impact on U.S. real GDP and employment.


Sounds good.

quote:

USMCA would strengthen and add complexity to the rules of origin requirements in the automotive sector by increasing regional value content (RVC) requirements and adding other requirements. USMCA’s requirements are estimated to increase U.S. production of automotive parts and employment in the sector, but also to lead to a small increase in the prices and small decrease in the consumption of vehicles in the United States.


Industry targeting doing what industry targeting does.

quote:

The Commission’s model estimates that USMCA would raise U.S. real GDP by $68.2 billion (0.35 percent) and U.S. employment by 176,000 jobs (0.12 percent). The model estimates that USMCA would likely have a positive impact on U.S. trade, both with USMCA partners and with the rest of the world. U.S. exports to Canada and Mexico would increase by $19.1 billion (5.9 percent) and $14.2 billion (6.7 percent), respectively. U.S. imports from Canada and Mexico would increase by $19.1 billion (4.8 percent) and $12.4 billion (3.8 percent), respectively. The model estimates that the agreement would likely have a positive impact on all broad industry sectors within the U.S. economy. Manufacturing would experience the largest percentage gains in output, exports, wages, and employment, while in absolute terms, services would experience the largest gains in output and employment.


Looks like a net change of 0 with Canada and a trade surplus (well a lessening of the trade deficit) with Mexico.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/26/19 at 8:53 am to
noteworthy i thought was that the main positive contributors were things that reduce uncertainty (things that were already in TPP), and that the auto rules of origin provisions were a net negative

but really i was just curious if you knew the kind of typical details. i skimmed the report, curious about their assumption on the future state of the steel/aluminum tariffs, and didn't see a word about it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram