- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remove
Posted on 3/13/20 at 6:35 pm to Tigerbait357
Posted on 3/13/20 at 6:35 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
think giving schools the ability to extend eligibility will be an option but the scholarship question and roster cap limits are areas I am intrigued how they handle.
Given how this was an extreme reaction to an unprecedented situation there could well be a unique expansion of eligibility and scholarship limits to accomodate the situation. The required funding could be covered by the revenue for championship events.
2
Posted on 3/14/20 at 2:36 pm to tigersbb
I thought about this last night but you wonder how the current pandemic could impact recruiting, specifically relating to the Olympics.
If the Olympics is potentially pushed back, multiple signees may push back their college careers. UCLA, Florida and Utah potentially are impacted by that.
If the Olympics is potentially pushed back, multiple signees may push back their college careers. UCLA, Florida and Utah potentially are impacted by that.
Posted on 3/15/20 at 10:44 am to tigersbb
I’m still against allowing seniors another year, as horrible as that may sound.
It would greatly benefit the teams who have the biggest senior classes. Those teams also have the biggest income freshmen to replace them. You have other teams who had one or two seniors and only two or so coming in and they will be competing with a team with less athletes on it and far less experience. If you limit scholarships/athlete totals then how is that fair to the freshmen who are suddenly cut from a team and left trying to find a last minute place to go? You just can’t. As harsh as it is, their careers are done. I don’t see any fair way to give them another season. Maybe someone will come up with an idea that works but I haven’t heard of one yet.
It would greatly benefit the teams who have the biggest senior classes. Those teams also have the biggest income freshmen to replace them. You have other teams who had one or two seniors and only two or so coming in and they will be competing with a team with less athletes on it and far less experience. If you limit scholarships/athlete totals then how is that fair to the freshmen who are suddenly cut from a team and left trying to find a last minute place to go? You just can’t. As harsh as it is, their careers are done. I don’t see any fair way to give them another season. Maybe someone will come up with an idea that works but I haven’t heard of one yet.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News