- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: With all the leaks how can anyone not see wade as vindicated on not talking?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:34 pm to ExpoTiger
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:34 pm to ExpoTiger
quote:
Holy shite roger how do you have over 160,000 posts? Damn.
Alaska can be a cold, lonely place baw.
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 2:35 pm
1
Posted on 3/12/19 at 3:14 pm to St Augustine
I apologize if this is a stupid question or has already been discussed, but I read in an article that: "Haney refused to discuss which coaches or how many [were being subpoenaed], as he said he wanted to honor the protective order in place by the court."
By being subpoenaed as a witness, could Wade have also become subject to that protective order? If so, would a protective order in a federal criminal case possibly include a restriction that witnesses are not to discuss the case or their upcoming testimony other than with their attorneys without being in contempt?
By being subpoenaed as a witness, could Wade have also become subject to that protective order? If so, would a protective order in a federal criminal case possibly include a restriction that witnesses are not to discuss the case or their upcoming testimony other than with their attorneys without being in contempt?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News