re: Actual Indictment of Dawkins and Gatto read this before posting another word

quote:

---

I qualified with "facts as seen by prosecutors", my statement of "providing facts" was more to the point that this is the "actually indictment" not my interpretation, my writing is obviously not up to legal scrutiny.

---

Ok, but you posted the “qualification” 61 minutes after your initial post, and long after several “unqualified” statements. You also posted it 1 minute before my criticism; thus, I was writing and did not see it.

Still, you did not clarify that legal analysis in an indictment is just an opinion, as well.