- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 737max crashes in Ethiopia. Killing 157
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:10 am to Saintsisit
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:10 am to Saintsisit
quote:They did.
I wonder if those pilots reported the problem w/ the sensors?
quote:
When the previous flight landed in Jakarta, mechanics examined the plane’s sensors. According to the report, the technicians repaired other sensors and equipment but did not fix the angle of attack sensor, Bloomberg says. After the maintenance teams worked on the jet, it was deemed airworthy to fly the following day from Jakarta to Pangkal Pinang.
LINK
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:27 am to When in Rome
WSJ - Inside U.S. Airlines’ Decisions to Keep Flying the 737 MAX
quote:
And even if problems were to occur, Southwest pilots have been briefed on the system that was suspected of malfunctioning in both crashes and have routinely trained on steps to recover should the MAX’s computer mistakenly force the nose down. “These safety-management systems don’t speculate,” Mr. Kelly says.
quote:This is interesting. I think it'll be fascinating to see what industry changes, if any, happen as a result of this situation. There seems to be a responsibility struggle playing out between aircraft and system design (Boeing) and airline quality/pilot training (U.S. airlines vs. airlines of other parts of the world). I think the airlines and the manufacturer share the responsibility, but there seems to be a fine line that divides the ratio of responsibility between the two in this case. In the example above, Southwest claims that they have routinely trained its pilots to recover if the MAX's computer mistakenly forces the nose down. That seems reasonable, and something the foreign airlines should aspire to do better (from what I've read). But they also installed extra features to make identifying the problem easier. Is it right that they, or any airline, should have to make modifications to their aircraft to support the flawed MCAS system? Shouldn't that be Boeing's responsibility? It seems like the airlines could have done more in other parts of the world to train their pilots to handle this system, but Boeing could have also made the problem easier to identify, or they could have designed something that didn't have a flaw in the first place (obviously).
Southwest, which has the largest U.S. fleet of MAX jets, also completed installation earlier this year of warning lights in its MAX cockpits that alert pilots if the two angle-of-attack sensors disagree, a sign one is failing. A faulty angle-of-attack indicator is suspected of playing a role in the Lion Air crash.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News