- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let’s say Trump Campaign was getting Hillary dirt from Wikileaks
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:07 am
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:07 am
How is that illegal?
And if that’s illegal, how was it legal for Hillary to get dirt on Trump from Russia via an ex-British agent?
Can someone explain this to me?
And if that’s illegal, how was it legal for Hillary to get dirt on Trump from Russia via an ex-British agent?
Can someone explain this to me?
12
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:09 am to Darth_Vader
I was getting dirt on the Hillary campaign from Wikileaks too, along with everyone else in the world with an internet connection.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:09 am to Darth_Vader
It isnt. Oppo research
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:10 am to Darth_Vader
Then why lie about it?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:11 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Can someone explain this to me?
(D) means do whatever you want.
(R) means Russia - investigate and imprison.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:18 am to Darth_Vader
In theory, if I steal something and sell it to you, you are guilty of possession of stolen property.
Unless you knew it was stolen, then you are guilty of receiving stolen property.
Unless you knew it was stolen, then you are guilty of receiving stolen property.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:19 am to Darth_Vader
Trump's team couldn't trust the mainstream media to criticize Clinton and her team. They were in the tank for her. And what Wilileaks reported was true! And damning! God bless Assange for exposing that corrupt bitch for who she is. Libs love the press being adversarial to Trump, but when Wikileaks does it to Clinton it's a criminal conspiracy.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:22 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Wow so everyone that read wikileaks online was guilty!
In theory, if I steal something and sell it to you, you are guilty of possession of stolen property.
Unless you knew it was stolen, then you are guilty of receiving stolen property.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:23 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
In theory, if I steal something and sell it to you, you are guilty of possession of stolen property.
Unless you knew it was stolen, then you are guilty of receiving stolen property.
This is a terrible analogy. Should Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald and Barton Gellman be prosecuted for receiving stolen info from Ed Snowden? How about the NY Times and the Washington Post for publishing it? Hell, should everyone who's ever read Wikileaks be prosecuted?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:24 am to Jbird
quote:
Wow so everyone that read wikileaks online was guilty!
I think you may have actually to be in possession of a copy.
But you may want to consult an attorney.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:27 am to WildTchoupitoulas
So no mens rea required? Hmmmm
Yet another subject where you are ignorant, yet feel comfortable opining. Strange habit.
Yet another subject where you are ignorant, yet feel comfortable opining. Strange habit.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:27 am to Jbird
quote:
Wow so everyone that read wikileaks online was guilty!
Is that not what the MSM told everyone. It was not important what it contained; just bad that we have it.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:27 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
This is a terrible analogy.
It's not an analogy. If the wikileaks documents are considered stolen property, and you are in possession of wikileaks documents, you are in possession of stolen property, which is a misdemeanor, I believe. But again, you may want to consult an attorney. There are plenty on the board.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:28 am to WildTchoupitoulas
No one possessed them. Read them sure.
I was not voting for Hillary before the emails. No change.
I was not voting for Hillary before the emails. No change.
This post was edited on 1/25/19 at 9:29 am
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:28 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
How is that illegal?
It's not.
quote:
And if that’s illegal, how was it legal for Hillary to get dirt on Trump from Russia via an ex-British agent?
That is a textbook example of foreign interference in an election.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:29 am to Darth_Vader
In bizarro world, the act of getting dirt is worse than the dirt itself
In other words, finding out that Person A murdered someone is worse than the fact that Person A murdered someone
In other words, finding out that Person A murdered someone is worse than the fact that Person A murdered someone
This post was edited on 1/25/19 at 9:31 am
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:31 am to fillmoregandt
quote:
In bizarro world, the act of getting dirt is worse than the dirt itself
this x's a thousand
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:31 am to BBONDS25
quote:
So no mens rea required?
Wouldn't that just be required to prove receiving stolen goods, and not simply being in possession of them?
quote:
another subject where you are ignorant
Hence:
quote:
But you may want to consult an attorney.
quote:
yet feel comfortable
Yes, quite, thank you.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:34 am to themunch
quote:
I was not voting for Hillary before the emails. No change.
Meh, me neither. That's why I didn't even bother to read them.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 9:36 am to Darth_Vader
Read the indictment. Conspiracy clearly displayed.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News