- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did you just catch that on Hannity? Mueller's team knew that the FISA
Posted on 1/18/19 at 1:23 am to Cali 4 LSU
Posted on 1/18/19 at 1:23 am to Cali 4 LSU
ETA to original post: it's Weismann (head of DOJ fraud section) & Zana Bahmad (terrorism prosecutor who worked with Lynch) who were briefed in AUGUST by Orr that the dossier is dirty & unreliable from a corrupted source (Steele). These two are on the Special Counsel's team. Clean up, anyone?
0
Posted on 1/18/19 at 1:31 am to Cali 4 LSU
Got a couple of the reliable liars in this thread defending this shite
Now you know why they trotted out Cohen again
Now you know why they trotted out Cohen again
Posted on 1/18/19 at 1:31 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:And the FISA warrant was illegally obtained, why? And you know this because of what evidence? And If the FISA warrant was illegally obtained, why doesn't Trump release the FISA application like Nunes and several Republicans are begging him to do, huh?
Because a man of character wouldn't associate himself with a fraudulent investigation started with an illegally obtained FISA warrant?
quote:He was appointed as Special Counsel to follow up on an existing FBI investigation. You seem to have forgotten about that fact.
So this piece of trash went on a fishing expedition against a duly elected president
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:04 am to Cali 4 LSU
If you have been following this closely than you know that the Russian Investigation initial intention was a CYA for the fisa warrants. It has now morphed into an all-out stalling effort. The lemon is out of juice. Squeezed dry. Now the question is how deep does the rabbit hole go? So far the origins of Spygate trace back to Hakluyt, a British Intelligence Firm.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:08 am to texridder
quote:
He was appointed as Special Counsel to follow up on an existing FBI investigation. You seem to have forgotten about that fact.
You seem to have forgotten recent discoveries from testimonies by Ohr and Page. The Dossier was the central piece of that investigation as well.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:16 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Oh wait... everyone has already known it was from opposition research and was disclosed as such since day one.
Really?
So, why did sHitlary lie about it for a year and only came clean after her "fixers" in Perkins Coie had to admit their role in paying for the dossier with illegally laundered money out of the sHitlary campaign ($12.4 million illegally reported as "attorney's fees" on sHitlary's campaign finance filings) before a federal court in OCTOBER 2017?
It wasn't disclosed on "day one." It was only disclosed a year later and only after Perkins Coie had to admit it's roll a year later in a letter before a federal court.
Why do you feel it necessary to lie on behalf of the filth and scum that is the Democrat Party, the Mueller investigators, and the sHitlary campaign?
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 6:29 am
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:24 am to texridder
quote:
And the FISA warrant was illegally obtained, why? And you know this because of what evidence?
The FISA warrant was illegally obtained because the information from the dossier was never confirmed through official intelligence channels. When trying to verify evidence for a FISA warrant, our govt. is supposed to use the Woods procedure, by law. We found out that the DOJ/FBI pursued this FISA days after receiving the dossier.
This dossier was selectively leaked through the media, illegally, by govt. employees and passed through the agencies through back-channeled and unverified means. The reason it was done this way was because the info was basically bullshite and couldn’t make it through the legal vetting process to get a FISA.
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 6:26 am
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:25 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Weismann
How has this guy not been disbarred yet?
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:31 am to Revelator
quote:
Weismann
From day one, he should never have become part of the Mueller investigation and should have notified Mueller of his conflict of interest. The bigger question is why hasn't Mueller taken him off the investigation now that his clear conflict of interest has been exposed?
Posted on 1/18/19 at 7:48 am to MMauler
It was disclosed in the FISA application. Old news.
Hannity is all about Nothingburgers
Hannity is all about Nothingburgers
Posted on 1/18/19 at 7:58 am to Deuces
Speaking of old news, what’s Devin Nunes up to lately? Haven’t heard anything from him in ages.
Probably has less info to pass on to Trump bc the Mueller team is more tight lipped.
Probably has less info to pass on to Trump bc the Mueller team is more tight lipped.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:03 am to Cali 4 LSU
As long as The Dems can ride Trump/Russia collusion into the 2020 election, it will have served its purposes.
This is Christine Blassey Ford on steroids..,
I guarantee that if the Dems win POTUS in 2020, we won’t even hear about Russia in any meaningful way...
This is Christine Blassey Ford on steroids..,
I guarantee that if the Dems win POTUS in 2020, we won’t even hear about Russia in any meaningful way...
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:11 am to texridder
quote:
The footnote in the FISA warrant application disclosed that the Dossier was opposition-created material.
This is tooooo easy, go ahead elightened one, show us this socalled footnote??????????????????????????
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:13 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
Mueller didn’t come on until long after this allegedly happened and long after the investigation started.
Did you read the link, the people he hired knew before he hired them, you think he did not know??????? Dont be ignorant.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:13 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
It was disclosed in the FISA application. Old news.
Show us where sHitlary's involvement in the Steele dossier was disclosed in the FISA application -- in a footnote or otherwise.
THAT is exactly what you are saying here. So, support your statement.
And, when you can't, and can only show that there was a series of completely f*cking misleading statements made IN FOOTNOTES in the FISA application, then come back here and admit that you are a completely f*cking ignorant hack who will believe anything PMSNBC tells you to believe.
Oh, and while you're at it, if sHitlary's involvement was disclosed from the beginning, why did she LIE about her involvement and PUBLICLY CLAIM she had no idea where the Steele dossier came from FOR A F*CKING YEAR???
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 8:29 am
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:16 am to texridder
Who did you vote for in 2016?
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:19 am to trinidadtiger
And this is not about the cover up of the bullshite associated with the FISA warrant. Its the cover up of the FISA warrant WHICH WAS A COVER UP OF THE FACT THEY WERE ALREADY SPYING ON TRUMP BEFORE IT WAS OBTAINED.
When you lie to cover up a lie, pretty soon you cant keep up with all the spinning plates....which is exactly what is happening, and the rats are scattering to cover their own at this point.
mueller was ordered in by rosenstein to divert attention from the cabal and particularly U1 since they both have their fingerprints all over that treasonous act.
When you lie to cover up a lie, pretty soon you cant keep up with all the spinning plates....which is exactly what is happening, and the rats are scattering to cover their own at this point.
mueller was ordered in by rosenstein to divert attention from the cabal and particularly U1 since they both have their fingerprints all over that treasonous act.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 8:54 am to MMauler
Does the footnote not say “Opposition research”?
If not, then I’ll concede your point. But if so, then you’re just banging pots.
The FISA court considered the relevance compared to the other sources and granted a FISA warrant. The dossier was not the only evidence considered.
If not, then I’ll concede your point. But if so, then you’re just banging pots.
The FISA court considered the relevance compared to the other sources and granted a FISA warrant. The dossier was not the only evidence considered.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 9:07 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
It truly is mind boggling that these people (the actual democrat politicians) believe/d that Trump is/was a Russian agent. I mean......where is the logical reasoning here? Makes me think one of them is a Russian agent cause they ALWAYS project.
Every time a Democrat accuses someone of something, they are doing it. See: racism, metoo, sexism, lying, fraud, embezzlement.....It never fails and never gets punished because republicans are spineless
Posted on 1/18/19 at 9:37 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Does the footnote not say “Opposition research”? If not, then I’ll concede your point. But if so, then you’re just banging pots.
WRONG.
The footnote stated that Steele was hired to “conduct research regarding Candidate #1,” Donald Trump, and Trump’s “ties to Russia,” and that the man who hired him was “likely looking for information that could be used to discredit [Trump’s] campaign.”
There was NOTHING about sHitlary or the DNC being the source of the payments or it being "opposition research".
Which explains why sHitlary LIED for a year until Perkins Coie was required to admit it's involvement to a federal court.
Seriously, doesn’t the FACT that you keep trying to LIE to protect the filth and scum that is sHitlary and the DNC tell you ANYTHING about yourself and your politics?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News