Started By
Message

re: Deadspin article about Pels

Posted on 1/6/19 at 7:19 am to
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 1/6/19 at 7:19 am to
The difference is that a merely competent organization wouldn't be okay with a Dell Demps running the show for as long as he has given his results.

You can quibble with titles. Crewz's point still stands- it's a poorly run organization because, at the end of the day, ownership just doesn't particularly care. That attitude bleeds down and is in the DNA of everything they do
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61594 posts
Posted on 1/6/19 at 7:28 am to
quote:

ownership just doesn't particularly care


I don't think that's true, or at least needs to be more specific with regards to winning at a high level. All indications are that Dell Demps is good at running a profitable NBA team. In an era where about the only way to lose money is to be a non contending tax payer that may not be saying much, but they've kept him around this long for a reason.

Also, many of the beat writers say him pulling off the Mirotic trade saved his job which meant his job was in danger prior to the trade. Is that about winning or money (bad investment)? It's hard to say.
This post was edited on 1/6/19 at 7:30 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram