Started By
Message

re: Deadspin article about Pels

Posted on 1/5/19 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61606 posts
Posted on 1/5/19 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

1 dude was fired from the Saints for a history of botched things, including misdiagnosing a broken leg as a bone bruise. That same dude stayed on with the Pels.


This is 100% incorrect. Dr. Suri was the new junior member of the team and his firing from the Saints was collateral damage from the senior doctor not doing a good job. I still don't like the optics that lead to Dr. Suri getting the job, the Pels keeping the doctor of the corporate sponsor while the Saints tried to find someone better.

That being said we have no evidence of Dr. Suri being tied in anyway to the poor practices of the past. Again, he's a medical doctor and he's on the bench at games looking at players instead of the old way of having a football trainer rub some dirt on it. I will say that these new injury protocols seem over protective in some ways, but it's better than the old way that got Jrue an extra year on the shelf and almost killed QPon.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 1/5/19 at 1:11 pm to
If the Bensons were serious about the Pels, Loomis wouldn’t be in charge.

As posted in another thread, in the fricking gameday program for the Pels, 7 paragraphs about Loomis’ football accomplishments. The Pels are nothing but a secondary priority to ownership. To be fair, that’s the smart business decision, but as a NBA fan, I don’t like it. That’s why I’d love it to see a partner come in.

I don’t blame Davis if he wants to leave at all. I do take issue with petty fans who refuse to see the obvious about ownership.
This post was edited on 1/5/19 at 1:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram