- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:07 pm to Capt ST
I was just thinking about this last week, and no, I have heard nothing at all. Not sure what would remain to rule upon, but I will do some digging.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 1:32 pm to Capt ST
OK, so the original judgment that went all the way up was more conceptual than practical, so the plaintiffs filed a motion asking for the trial court to mark the actual boundaries(normal low water mark). A judgment was rendered on the 10th by the trial court in the 9th JDC, but it is not yet available for me to read on the clerk's site. I will keep looking.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News