Started By
Message

re: What would’ve happened if Britain had surrendered in WWII?

Posted on 12/19/18 at 11:07 am to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98732 posts
Posted on 12/19/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I still think Japan would be way too hostile in the Pacific for our likings. It may have been another year or two, but I still think we go to war with Japan regardless.


Would we really go to war to protect the colonies of countries that no longer exist? While America bore the brunt of the Pacific war, the British contributed substantial Naval assets. They wouldn't be available under this scenario. And then there's Australia. What would their role be? Would they stand alone, or be forced into some kind of neutral or subservient position for the sake of survival?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110076 posts
Posted on 12/19/18 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Would we really go to war to protect the colonies of countries that no longer exist? While America bore the brunt of the Pacific war, the British contributed substantial Naval assets. They wouldn't be available under this scenario. And then there's Australia. What would their role be? Would they stand alone, or be forced into some kind of neutral or subservient position for the sake of survival?


Someone was going to do something about the Japanese eventually. The Japanese were so fricking hardcore that they disturbed high ranking Nazi officials with their brutality and barbarism. The Nazis told them to cut some of the shite, that’s how bad they were. I just don’t see a scenario where we don’t go to war with Japan.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram