Started By
Message

re: New Mueller Filing - Do What?

Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:44 pm to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14287 posts
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

But 7 months later after consulting with Andrew McCabe who apparently had a lot of animus with Flynn revised the 302 in August of 2017 to edit the account of Flynn's interview from not lying to lying.
So if there were 47 FBI agents in the room and all of their 302's said they didn't think Flynn was lying, but in fact, he was lying, they can't charge him because of the 302's.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23386 posts
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

So if there were 47 FBI agents in the room and all of their 302's said they didn't think Flynn was lying, but in fact, he was lying, they can't charge him because of the 302's


When the questions were regarding conversations to which they already had recorded?

Yes. It's corrupt as frick
Posted by RazorBroncs
Harding Bisons Fan
Member since Sep 2013
13608 posts
Posted on 12/14/18 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

So if there were 47 FBI agents in the room and all of their 302's said they didn't think Flynn was lying, but in fact, he was lying, they can't charge him because of the 302's.


Put any terms on it you want, it seems pretty shitty regardless.

Is this really a good use of FBI resources when it had no impact whatsoever? It's entrapment. Flynn may have "lied" but it was pretty clearly unintentional, is this where we are as a society?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram