Started By
Message

re: Why most academics lean left

Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:05 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43151 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:05 am to
quote:

No. Reality is reality. Theories are different ways to attempt to interpret reality.

The utopian world academics envision is typically buttressed by theories that work better on paper or in a vacuum than out in what we all know as reality. Given that their livelihood is dependent upon the government, it's not surprising that most of their theories favor big government as well.

But, no, theories are not "how things start the process of coming into reality."




These 'intellectuals' are caught up in the group-think that = "if only the world worked this way, everything would be easy." They are constantly looking for the anti-gravity machine or the perpetual motion system.

Yep - some things would work easier if stuff didn't fall on the floor - BUT a multitude of OTHER things would all go to shite.

These "progressives" only congratulate themselves on their ideas that only work in zero gravity - and describe as "hateful" anyone who points out all the problems that a world without gravity would entail.

They are 'smart' in the context of being able to expound for hours on the benefits of their zero gravity world, using big words and complex equations and flowery rhetoric, but cannot or will not engage with those grubby 'haters' who ask real questions about harms that it would entail.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 6:06 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425823 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 7:03 am to
quote:

These 'intellectuals' are caught up in the group-think that = "if only the world worked this way, everything would be easy." They are constantly looking for the anti-gravity machine or the perpetual motion system.

this isn't even really true

most everything of note in the soft sciences, from a founational perspective, has already been crafted, discussed, disected, etc

what these academics primarily rely upon to create novelty is deconstruction practices. they're trying to attack societal foundations and accepted beliefs so that they can get those ideas published. this is why they latch onto overlapping ideas like postmodernism, b/c much of that philosophy is a similar deconstruction (of truth, on a much more general level)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram