- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why most academics lean left
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:05 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:05 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
No. Reality is reality. Theories are different ways to attempt to interpret reality.
The utopian world academics envision is typically buttressed by theories that work better on paper or in a vacuum than out in what we all know as reality. Given that their livelihood is dependent upon the government, it's not surprising that most of their theories favor big government as well.
But, no, theories are not "how things start the process of coming into reality."
These 'intellectuals' are caught up in the group-think that = "if only the world worked this way, everything would be easy." They are constantly looking for the anti-gravity machine or the perpetual motion system.
Yep - some things would work easier if stuff didn't fall on the floor - BUT a multitude of OTHER things would all go to shite.
These "progressives" only congratulate themselves on their ideas that only work in zero gravity - and describe as "hateful" anyone who points out all the problems that a world without gravity would entail.
They are 'smart' in the context of being able to expound for hours on the benefits of their zero gravity world, using big words and complex equations and flowery rhetoric, but cannot or will not engage with those grubby 'haters' who ask real questions about harms that it would entail.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 6:06 am
Posted on 12/10/18 at 7:03 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
These 'intellectuals' are caught up in the group-think that = "if only the world worked this way, everything would be easy." They are constantly looking for the anti-gravity machine or the perpetual motion system.
this isn't even really true
most everything of note in the soft sciences, from a founational perspective, has already been crafted, discussed, disected, etc
what these academics primarily rely upon to create novelty is deconstruction practices. they're trying to attack societal foundations and accepted beliefs so that they can get those ideas published. this is why they latch onto overlapping ideas like postmodernism, b/c much of that philosophy is a similar deconstruction (of truth, on a much more general level)
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News