- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Play that takes no time off clock?
Posted on 11/26/18 at 11:48 am to yaherrdme
Posted on 11/26/18 at 11:48 am to yaherrdme
quote:
You realize the clock reads 1 after it goes under two and it could be anywhere from 1.9 sec down to 1.0
I think you’re backwards there. In this theory when it reads 0 there’s actually 0.9 seconds left? Makes no sense. When it reads 1 second there 1 second left, not almost 2. If you’re right, Miles would’ve won the Auburn game in 2016.
1
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:04 pm to jbro12
quote:
I think you’re backwards there. In this theory when it reads 0 there’s actually 0.9 seconds left? Makes no sense. When it reads 1 second there 1 second left, not almost 2. If you’re right, Miles would’ve won the Auburn game in 2016.
Good point here. The more I think about it you are correct. The only point there is actually one full second showing on the clock is the instant it changes from 2 to 1, any moment after that is actually less than 1 second. So if that play STARTED with less than 1 second, it is physically impossible to hike and spike the ball. The only possible conclusion is the clock did not start at the snap.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News