- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hog hunting gone wrong
Posted on 11/10/18 at 11:34 pm to Bawcephus
Posted on 11/10/18 at 11:34 pm to Bawcephus
The alternative is he thought his friend was somewhere that he wasn’t (as a fellow hunter I hope the assumption we all take when hunting together is we know where everyone is). You would never know that isn’t true had he not gave that statement. If he thought friend was somewhere else, and fired thinking that, then no gross negligence. I still don’t think it’s gross negligence unless alcohol or some other illegal drug was involved and as another poster stated a criminal act always requires at minimum gross negligence. I’m just saying, as a defense attorney (mainly), had he not made that statement he wouldn’t have been charged but firing after starring affirmatively that he didn’t know where he was opens him up to criminal liability possibly. I still think there is an argument to be made it’s not gross negligence but that’s for a jury to decide now.
With all that said he’s absolutely fricked on a wrongful death civil suit that requires only a showing of simple negligence.
With all that said he’s absolutely fricked on a wrongful death civil suit that requires only a showing of simple negligence.
This post was edited on 11/10/18 at 11:41 pm
Posted on 11/11/18 at 12:05 am to TigernMS12
The story sounds like BS.
And how do you shoot someone in the chest and not know what you’re liooking at.
If a shot gun, he did it on purpose. A rifle is more excusable as its travel distance is much further.
And how do you shoot someone in the chest and not know what you’re liooking at.
If a shot gun, he did it on purpose. A rifle is more excusable as its travel distance is much further.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News