Started By
Message

re: i wouldn't be surprised if we werent looking for an OC

Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:26 am to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67691 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Offense is different - everything the scheme does changes the blocking scheme - how much the TEs do in pass protection, the route tree, the timing, the snap, EVERYTHING changes with a new offensive scheme.


You’re not wrong, but there are a lot of 1st year offensive revamps that are very successful.

The last 2 places Kendall Briles has been had immediate success.

Cumbie and Meachum immediately made TCU better.

Lincoln Riley took Oklahoma over the top.

Mullen is scoring 8 points more a game with no talent at Florida.

Syracuse went from 119 in total offense to 42nd when Dino Babers took over.

Spread offenses are all about scheming up an offense. There is a reason Baylor got significantly better while recruiting about the same. Speed and simple play concepts mask a lot of talent deficiencies
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

The last 2 places Kendall Briles has been had immediate success.


It's no secret, I'm for going "all out" to beat Saban. That means Art to me, but Kendall would be right up there.

Frankly, if we can't lure a Briles, Kiffin or someone comparable and really lock them in for 3 or 4 years, any change is just additional, self-inflicted chaos.

Unless you're advocating starting over from the top now. You're not advocating that, are you?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram