- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stephen Hawking was full of shite
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:53 pm to L1C4
Posted on 10/18/18 at 9:53 pm to L1C4
quote:no one can know that God doesn't exist. it would take complete knowledge of everything supernatural which no person can obtain since they are limited by the natural world. it's like a square trying to know what a cube is.
He said there is no proof that God exists
otoh, we can know that God does exist if he has revealed himself to us, which he has.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 1:44 am to bfniii
quote:What kind of nonsense is this. You could just stated “you can’t prove a negative” and that “absence of proof is not proof of absence.”
no one can know that God doesn't exist. it would take complete knowledge of everything supernatural which no person can obtain since they are limited by the natural world. it's like a square trying to know what a cube is.
And since I’m reading this thread backwards I I suspected you were just regurgitating (if not straight up plagiarizing) someone else. Your random inclusion of Latin phrases and your philosophical responses that were written like an actual philosophy manuscript, but they were nothing like your posts I’ve seen before. Not to mention that philosophical writing style, doesn’t lend itself well to a forum/discussion like this. A person who could write like that, or truly understand it, would probably be able to know this and explain it without the flare. But a person just regurgitating it but not truly understanding it wouldn’t be able to simplify it.
But since I don’t really understand much of that myself, it wasn’t until I came across this post that it became obvious since argument only required simple logical justification, not whatever you write.
By the way, I understand exactly what you wrote in Latin. I don’t even know pig Latin though but this thing called Google can make me seem smart too.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News