Started By
Message

re: DL should be the priority for this class.

Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:28 am to
Posted by NOSA
Member since Jan 2004
9648 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Uhhh. I think we ended up okay at these positions. ?


Recruiting isn't about the next year on the field.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Recruiting isn't about the next year on the field.


At some positions it is and at some positions it's not. With DL and OL it is almost always NOT about the next year. That's the problem with all these people saying we need to bring in a 5* that can play right away. These guys pretty much don't exist with few exceptions. DL and OL are developmental positions.

Quarterback is a developmental position. Thankfully (hopefully) we have Burrow for another year after this one. And there isn't a single quarterback recruit from last year that I would take over Burrow, so in my opinion, the staff hit a grand slam as far as QB recruiting goes last year.

Defensive back is not usually a developmental position. It is very common for freshmen to come in and contribute immediately. Yes, we really could have used Surtain or Goodrich last year, but we were able to pick up a solid contributor for this year (Terrance Alexander), we have a great class coming in next year, and we have enough good players on the roster who are coming back for it to not be an area of concern next year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram