- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:20 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:20 pm to ShortyRob
If you reallllly wanted to let rural voters have more power (all of flyover county, not just part of it), you'd break down the electoral college down to each county. That way, rural voters everywhere would have more power.
As it stands, a rural vote in NY state is worth the same as a vote in Manhattan. Which is non-nonsensical if you're worried about the rural/urban divide.
Same for Texas. People live in tiny towns in TX. No electoral benefits there. Hmmmm.
As it stands, a rural vote in NY state is worth the same as a vote in Manhattan. Which is non-nonsensical if you're worried about the rural/urban divide.
Same for Texas. People live in tiny towns in TX. No electoral benefits there. Hmmmm.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:26 pm to cahoots
quote:
If you reallllly wanted to let rural voters have more power (all of flyover county, not just part of it), you'd break down the electoral college down to each county. That way, rural voters everywhere would have more power.
You fundamentally misunderstand the EC. States already have this power if they so chose to exercise it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News