Started By
Message

re: FSBDL 2019 - OMT is your Champion

Posted on 10/10/18 at 10:02 am to
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 10:02 am to
quote:

3. Eliminate the "or six starts" from the IP pitching requirement each scoring period, due to TB approach to starting rotations.


I don't like this one, because under that scenario, all an owner needs to do is roster 1 SP and 9 relievers and he will more than likely hit his IP requirement for the week.

If we are going to drop the six start requirement, I would also prefer that we make it a requirement to have at least 4 or 5 SP on your team at all times.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72058 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 10:04 am to
Gotta keep the starts requirement

Up the IP requirement by 5 IP with it
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 10:10 am to
I don't think it's a problem the way it is but I do see the argument of it potentially becoming an issue in the future. I like the idea if it is dropped, IP limit should be increased a little bit.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 10:55 am to
There is no rule requiring 6 pitching starts - it's an either/or rule - 35 IP or 6 starts:

quote:

1. Each team must pitch a minimum of 35 IP OR have at least six starts per week.


I don't understand the proposal to eliminate 6 starts considering the existing rule.

If anything the TB scheme would necessitate more starts, however, why alter our rules because one MLB team employed this scheme this one season?
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 10:59 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram