re: My theory is that Judge's Book is the epicenter of Ford's story...

She told her therapist that she was assaulted in the mid 80's in her late teens by 4 boys. Kav would have been away at college.

She changed that story for the lawyers and for the Senate, but Judge apparently mentions in his book that he worked at Safeway in 1982. This is how she connects everything together, and likely why she harped on the Safeway meeting with judge.

I also believe this is why she can't recall how she got home. She drove, but her having a license doesn't fit with the timeline she needs to implicate Kav, so she conveniently leaves it out.

I think she was likely involved in some type of assault at squees house in the late 80's. This is what she shared with her therapist in 2012.

They dated in high school and he would have almost certainly wanted to get some from an ex over summer break. She simply changes a few characters, and the date. I just can't get it out of my head how perfectly squees house matches the scene, how she revealed they dated, and how quickly she shot down Whelens twitter theory on squee. I'm also hung up on how she remembers everyone at the party but not a homeowner. If she replaces squee with kav, the story loses its homeowner, an oversight on her part.