- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What was the best WWII tank?
Posted on 9/30/18 at 4:51 pm to Cooter Davenport
Posted on 9/30/18 at 4:51 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Hint: tanks are not for fighting other tanks. That’s insanely resource-wasteful. They’re not for fighting infantry alone either - they’re actually really vulnerable to infantry. Combined arms wins the day. That’s why the Sherman was so effective despite being supposedly undergunned and underarmored. It wasn’t meant to fight tanks in the first place. It was a combined arms tool. People who miss that point and go on and on about its weakness and think it was a terrible weapon don’t understand WWII tactics or the intended proper role of the tank. Actually the Sherman was very effective.
Oh, look. Someone who actually knows what the frick he is talking about.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News