Started By
Message

re: ULM gained 550 yards and gave up zero sacks

Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:10 pm to
I think this offense is bad, but if we needed to put up 400 yards to win we could have done it. Would have just been a lot of mistakes that would have kept them in the game even more
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:10 pm to
So your rationale is we just did what we had to cause we were winning.

First series three and out must’ve been an anomaly.
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I don't even know how to respond to this


We lost both tackles. Are you going to pretend that isn’t an issue. We were lucky it was against SLU and not Auburn.
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
30094 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:11 pm to
Quick throws
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:13 pm to
350 yards passing with no hail mary
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:15 pm to
Yes I am going to not only pretend it doesn’t matter. I will say I expect our back ups to easily handle their people.

I’ll also state that I expect our OC to be able to scheme around our weaknesses.


Eta: This is against a FCS team, of course injuries will impact games played against teams with similar talent.


We had 3 yards passing in the second and needed a Hail Mary and 80 yard fumble return to get into the fricking 20s
This post was edited on 9/9/18 at 12:18 pm
Posted by justice
Member since Feb 2006
54652 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Hold up, don’t bring facts and reason in here! We are supposed to be melting....hard af!

it’s great that Monroe passed all game and didn’t give up a sack. They sacked burrow how many times?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85489 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Didn't they also give up 31 points? Turn over the ball twice? Almost lose the damn game? They had that many yards because they needed to. Or else they lose.


Hold up, don’t bring facts and reason in here! We are supposed to be melting....hard af!


So we were trying to keep the offensive and defensive starters on the field the entire game? That was the plan?

shite, we're in bigger trouble than I thought.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:20 pm to
I would keep our 'starting' line in as long as our starting QB was in. Which should have been all game.
Posted by StupidBinder
Jawja
Member since Oct 2017
6392 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

How does that happen?


Because the transitive property isn’t applicable to football.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:22 pm to
But that isn’t a transitive argument. This is a statement that SELU has a bad defense.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:23 pm to
It seems 31 points proves that
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:24 pm to
Really. You must have really low expectations. Keep on whistling past
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:26 pm to
Do you think LSU put up all the yards it could or all the yards it needed to?

Same question for ULM.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:27 pm to
All it could.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:27 pm to
Same shite different year
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

All it could.



That answer explains your shitposting.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:29 pm to
Ohhh. So we breaking out the secret playbook? Or the better scheme? Or the players will try really hard approach next week.


So we just got the shite kicked out and f our line and beat up our QB for shits and giggles.

Now I have heard it all
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:33 pm to
I don't think there is a secret playbook. I think we just run the offense from the 1st half more than the second half when we need to move the ball.

I don't think we see a huge offensive change, but we will try to move the ball when we need to and protect the lead when we don't need to.

Leads to a terrible offense to watch, but gives us the best chance to win with a bad offense.
This post was edited on 9/9/18 at 12:34 pm
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56710 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 12:34 pm to
We just looked like shite on purpose. How did I not see it earlier. All the other championship coaches in hat beat the shite out of their rent a wins should take note
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram