Started By
Message

re: Why do Republicans ignore Divorce and Male Reproductive Rights for Men

Posted on 8/30/18 at 11:04 am to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51133 posts
Posted on 8/30/18 at 11:04 am to
quote:

That is not remotely on point.

This guy got sued for support, and he ignored the Citation that was served upon him. He claims that he did not receive it, but two different hearings separated by YEARS found otherwise (one a hearing on his original default and a second recent hearing).

Texas judges look SERIOUSLY at proper service before granting default judgments.

If a court had found that he was not served back in the day, the case would start over, the DNA would be admissible, and he would owe no support.

Instead, he got sued, ignored it, had a judgment taken against him and wants a do-over many years down the line.

The lesson here is “Do not ignore the Citation when You Get Sued.”



None of this should be relevant if the child isn't his. The fact that DNA would ever not be admissible for custody and child support cases is outrageous.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/30/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

None of this should be relevant if the child isn't his. The fact that DNA would ever not be admissible for custody and child support cases is outrageous.
I disagree. You don’t get to keep repeatedly trying the same case until you like the results. You get one chance. He had his chance and chose to ignore it. Stupid games, stupid prizes.

Opinions will vary.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 8/30/18 at 11:07 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 3:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram