- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gary Oldman in Darkest Hour
Posted on 8/20/18 at 8:20 am
Posted on 8/20/18 at 8:20 am
Could very well be the best performance I’ve seen...ever.
Just watched this weekend on HBO. Amazing performance.
Lily James would get it.
Just watched this weekend on HBO. Amazing performance.
Lily James would get it.
Posted on 8/20/18 at 8:38 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Rare color footage of Churchill reacting to Germany's unconditional surrender in May 1945.
Posted on 8/20/18 at 8:40 am to CrazyJoeDivola
This and Dunkirk were two huge disappointments. At least in this film, we got to see Lily James.
Posted on 8/20/18 at 1:14 pm to CrazyJoeDivola
Good transformational performance, yes, and incredible, yes,...
but when you have a role with that much makeup and once you find the voice you want, those parts are not as difficult many make them out to be because you have so many secondary elements to immerse yourself in the role.
Honestly, playing an everyman or a character where it's only you and the camera, that's a far more difficult "great" performance to pull off.
That's why I always thought Cruise was so much better in Rain Man than Hoffman. Cruise had the hard role, Hoffman just had to find his place and then go with a "one note" character.
Cruise had to really carry the story along, with no real gimmicks, all while being an a-hole that you liked... Much more difficult to pull off.
It's why I also thought Rourke was so good in the Wrestler... It was just him, opening a vein for the character. No prosthetics, no accent, no limp, no nothing. Just a beaten down man.
but when you have a role with that much makeup and once you find the voice you want, those parts are not as difficult many make them out to be because you have so many secondary elements to immerse yourself in the role.
Honestly, playing an everyman or a character where it's only you and the camera, that's a far more difficult "great" performance to pull off.
That's why I always thought Cruise was so much better in Rain Man than Hoffman. Cruise had the hard role, Hoffman just had to find his place and then go with a "one note" character.
Cruise had to really carry the story along, with no real gimmicks, all while being an a-hole that you liked... Much more difficult to pull off.
It's why I also thought Rourke was so good in the Wrestler... It was just him, opening a vein for the character. No prosthetics, no accent, no limp, no nothing. Just a beaten down man.
This post was edited on 8/20/18 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 8/20/18 at 1:18 pm to CrazyJoeDivola
Watched it again last night. Great performance. Not sure why anyone would label this as a disappointment.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News